Difference between revisions of "Bookmarks"
Frankiezafe (Talk | contribs) |
Frankiezafe (Talk | contribs) (→visuals) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
| − | File:Rotterdam serra e18525.jpg | + | File:Rotterdam serra e18525.jpg|Richard Serra, Ramble 3-54, 2015, c/o Pictoright Amsterdam 2017 |
| + | File:Rotterdam keestimmer IMG 5305 1.jpg|Kees Timmer 'Felis onca' circa 1953. | ||
| + | File:Rotterdm Emanuel de Witte 005.jpg|Emanuel de Witte, Interior of a Church, 1668 | ||
| + | File:Rotterdam jaapwagemaker 6964103394 7ea13b5304 b.jpg|Jaap Wagemaker, unidentified details | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Revision as of 11:08, 17 September 2017
Contents
visuals
Visit @ museum boijmans, rotterdam, 2017/09/17
Richard Serra, Ramble 3-54, 2015, c/o Pictoright Amsterdam 2017
Kees Timmer 'Felis onca' circa 1953.
Emanuel de Witte, Interior of a Church, 1668
Jaap Wagemaker, unidentified details
theory
“Free software” means software that respects users' freedom and community. Roughly, it means that the users have the freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. Thus, “free software” is a matter of liberty, not price. To understand the concept, you should think of “free” as in “free speech,” not as in “free beer”. We sometimes call it “libre software,” borrowing the French or Spanish word for “free” as in freedom, to show we do not mean the software is gratis.
In order to foster a free and fair society I affirm that I will practice my profession with responsibility and with dignity.
>> Manifesto for Responsible Software Development
Reading Interfaces - http://reader.lgru.net/collections/reading-interfaces/ - The division and the implicit hierarchy between the user who accesses the interface and the developer who has insight into the underlying code sparks many questions. How does an interface expose and translate the underlying digital objects? To what extent does it frame and script the user behaviour? Are coding skills necessary for computer literacy? And is it possible to actively/deeply engage with software, if one confines oneself to the provided interface?
- (echo echo) echo (echo): Command Line Poetics - http://reader.lgru.net/texts/echo-echo-echo-echo-command-line-poetics/ - Most arguments in favor of command line versus graphical user interface (GUI) computing are flawed by system administrator Platonism...
- Alan Kay, "A User Interface: a Personal View" -http://reader.lgru.net/texts/about-alan-kay-a-user-interface-a-personal-view/ - Alan Kay is one of the most important figure in the history of human/computer interaction. He and his team at Xerox PARC have conceived many tools and paradigms that shape today's computing, including object oriented language, "windows, icons, menus, pointer" style of interaction, etc....
- Turing complete user - http://reader.lgru.net/texts/turing-complete-user/ - Computers are getting invisible. They shrink and hide. They lurk under the skin and dissolve in the cloud. We observe the process like an eclipse of the sun, partly scared, partly overwhelmed.
- Inside Photoshop - http://reader.lgru.net/texts/inside-photoshop/ - Contemporary media is experienced, created, edited, remixed, organized and shared with software....
Subjectivité narcissique et sciences. Interview avec Étienne Klein sur youtube.
politics
The REAL reason we use Linux
We tell people we use Linux because it’s secure. Or because it’s free, because it’s customizable, because it’s free (the other meaning), because it has excellent community support… But all of that is just marketing bullshit. We tell that to non-Linuxers because they wouldn’t understand the real reason. And when we say those false reasons enough, we might even start to believe them ourselves.